Pagan Political Pilfering

For anyone who doesn’t remember, Dan Halloran is a rare creature, being both a Republican officeholder and an open pagan. Only he wasn’t so open as a pagan when he ran, but whatever. Unfortunately, he is not so rare a politician, as he was recently arrested for fraud and bribery charges.

This is unfortunate, for as Jason at the Wild Hunt points out, Halloran was the highest office-holding pagan in the US. That inspiring and historic first is now besmirched:

Halloran was a complex figure who could be charming and infuriating depending on who he was interacting with, and I can’t picture many politicians within Tea Party and Libertarian circles overcoming the obstacles he did, to the point of making a serious bid for congress. Halloran was living proof that being a Pagan wasn’t an impossible obstacle to modern political office, even if you were a conservative Republican in New York City. It is for this reason that these revelations are especially disheartening, because our collective history will now mark Halloran’s “firsts” with the asterisk of scandal and corruption.

It is significant that Halloran not only attained the office he did, but did so as a Tea Party backed Republican. This flies in the face of several stereotypes, the least of which are that pagans can’t be political conservatives and that the conservatives (and the Tea Party in particular) are intolerant of diversity and only support Extreme Christian Fundamentalists/Evangelicals. Unfortunately he also demonstrated that pagans are just as capable of being corrupt as anyone else.

My take? Many conservatives will blame the fact that Halloran is pagan for his corruption. Many pagans will blame the fact that he is Republican. And pagans seeking political office (from any party — the Democrats haven’t been kind to us either) will be set back.

This is just another reminder that there are serious implications for being openly pagan and very public. Probably more so than Christians, pagans in such positions have to be aware that they “represent” paganism to those who don’t know (and probably don’t trust) us. It may not be fair, but it’s how it is, and we have to deal with it for now.

Halloran represented us to New York. He stood before his fellows and said “I may pray different, but I am just like all of you. I am not strange or weird or scary. I am likable and personable. Trust me to serve you.”

And he was lying. And now we all look bad, even if just a little bit.



Dan Halloran, you’re an asshole.


3 responses to “Pagan Political Pilfering

  1. Totally agree. The day he answered the religion question by talking about his Catholic childhood was the day I wrote him off. I thought Heathenism taught honor?

    • He’s only human. There are assholes of every religion who give lip service to teachings but ignore them in practice. As pagans our bad examples tend to stand out more, I suspect, if only because our numbers are fewer. But we’re very good at taking a page from the Christians and saying, “oh, that person couldn’t be a *real* pagans, because *real* pagans don’t do that. Halloran is self-serving and corrupt because that’s how he is, and that’s how he chose to be. His paganism is really independent of that. But because he did claim the pagan label, he was representing us to the public, and his dismissal of that fact made his corruption a betrayal as well.

      I suppose Christians could argue the same. I know my parents are none to happy with the Catholic Church and that whole shuffle sex offender priests thing. But Christians by in large don’t face the same scrutiny and distrust that pagans do.

      • Here’s another way to look at it: since Christianity is privileged in the USA, it costs nothing socially to be Christian, and so we’re accustomed to nominal Christians. In fact, we’re surprised when we meet someone who actually acts like a follower of Jesus. The effort and risk to be almost anything else, especially something as marginal as Pagan or Heathen, is so high that there’s a legitimate expectation that such people will actually live up to whatever standards their religion sets, or at least show some signs of taking it seriously.

        And, yeah, by the time I got to the end of that paragraph, I had thought of many, many counter-examples, and was laughing at the idea that you were, too.

        But that’s how it *should* be, lalala.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s